ThreadingtheEyeoftheCognitiveNeedle_img1.gif Threading the Eye of the Cognitive Needle
Doctoral Application Draft
The effective use of technology does not lie in the automation of the past.
Therefore, the value of computer systems will not be determined by how well they can be used in the applications they were designed for, but how easily they can be fit to cases that were never thought of.
Thus a key question is whether valuable insights into complexity, vital to governance and self- governance of social processes, may only be representable and comprehensible through presentations of an essentially artistic nature. It is then their aesthetic properties that have valuable ordering and integrative functions. Given the well- demonstrated weaknesses of current international policy- making, it would be unwise to assume that this is not the case.
I hope in part to demonstrate the feasibility of enhancing comprehension, and navigating complexity, using features uniquely dependent upon the riches and subtleties of artistic insight. The concern here is with the design of a flexible architecture to demonstrate how the power of both "scientific" and "artistic" approaches may be integrated to enhance comprehension and navigation of complexity -- as well as offering new forms of creativity in response to complex conditions. I hope to develop the software (iMap) and process necessary to the new disciplines implied above.
These complementary tools involve a variety of overlapping research challenges. The proposal focuses on developing application of tools rather than on the tools themselves.
Pressing problems in knowledge handling policy
At a time when we are exposed to:
  • a multitude of documents in every specialized field of knowledge,
  • a multiplicity of often-unsuspected interconnections between the concerns of different specializations, and
  • an increasing need to interrelate the knowledge of seemingly unrelated fields, we are having difficulty in:
    • (i) producing documents cheaply,
    • (ii) distributing them widely, rapidly and in sufficient languages, and
    • (iii) organizing the documentation centres, libraries and information systems to handle them.

The complexity of the knowledge handling system is such that conceptual ambiguity is the rule rather than the exception. At the same time we are running short of the paper which permits us the luxury of our incredibly ineffective, document-oriented system.
"An increase in accessibility without a corresponding increase in human assimilation rate will be self- defeating... Often one needs to know only a central idea, result, theorem, or the methods employed, with bibliographical information for later reference, but finds that a short course in unneeded detail is required to get to it."
See related topics and documents